| BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS | OPDIVO IV (n=353) |
PLACEBO (n=356) |
|---|---|---|
| Median age (range), years | 65.3 (30–92) | 65.9 (42–88) |
| Male, % | 75.1 | 77.2 |
Region, % United States |
13.9 |
14.9 |
ECOG PS,* % 0 |
63.5 |
62.1 |
Tumor origin at initial diagnosis, % Urinary bladder |
|
|
| Minor histological variants present, % | 41.1 | 39.6 |
| PD-L1 ≥1% (IVRS), % | 39.7 | 39.9 |
| Prior neoadjuvant cisplatin, % | 43.3 | 43.5 |
Pathologic T stage at resection,‡§ % pTO–2 |
22.7 58.4 16.1 2.5 |
24.2 57.3 17.4 0.8 |
Nodal status at resection,§ % N+ |
47.3 |
47.2 |
Adjuvant Treatment of UC
OPDIVO Qvantig® offers a chance to change
the future for patients with high-risk
urothelial carcinoma1-5*†
PD-L1=programmed death-ligand 1; UC=urothelial carcinoma.
*OPDIVO Qvantig was not evaluated in Checkmate 274. The use of OPDIVO Qvantig is supported by the pivotal trials of OPDIVO IV and Checkmate 67T. In Checkmate 67T, OPDIVO Qvantig demonstrated non-inferiority to OPDIVO IV with a comparable PK and ORR profile.1,6
- mDFS in all randomized patients (minimum follow‑up time of 5.9 months; median follow‑up time of 20.9 months for OPDIVO IV and 19.5 months for placebo): 20.8 months (95% CI: 16.5–27.6) for OPDIVO IV and 10.8 months (95% CI: 8.3–13.9) for placebo; HR=0.70 (95% CI: 0.57–0.86); P=0.00083.2,7
- mDFS in patients with PD‑L1 ≥1% (minimum follow‑up time of 6.3 months; median follow‑up time of 22.1 months for OPDIVO IV and 18.7 months for placebo): NR (95% CI: 21.2–NE) for OPDIVO IV and 8.4 months (95% CI: 5.6–21.2) for placebo; HR=0.55 (95% CI: 0.39–0.77); P=0.0005278.2,7
INDICATIONS
- OPDIVO® (nivolumab), as a single agent, is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) who are at high risk of recurrence after undergoing radical resection of UC.
- OPDIVO Qvantig® (nivolumab + hyaluronidase-nvhy), as monotherapy, is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) who are at high risk of recurrence after undergoing radical resection of UC.
Scroll down for the latest overall survival data
There is a need for approved adjuvant options to help extend DFS
In a retrospective, observational cohort study† of patients 65 years and older with UC at high risk‡ of recurrence after radical resection, the mDFS§ was 13.5 months.8||
Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also included.8
†This study included 665 patients from the SEER-Medicare database who had UC of the bladder or upper tract at a high risk of recurrence after radical resection.8
‡Prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy: AJCC stage T2–T4a or N+ and M0 for bladder site and AJCC stage T2–T4 or N+ and M0 for other sites; no neoadjuvant chemotherapy: AJCC stage T3–T4a or N+ and M0 for bladder site and AJCC stage T3–T4 or N+ and M0 for other sites.8
§DFS was defined as the first occurrence of surgery, radiotherapy, ≥1 administration of systemic chemotherapy, or palliative TURBT after 120 days of primary surgical resection. Those who received adjuvant treatment within 120 days of radical resection were excluded from the study.8
||mDFS was 13.5 months (95% CI: 11.3–16.8).8
AJCC=American Joint Committee on Cancer; CI=confidence interval; DFS=disease-free survival; IV=intravenous, mDFS=median disease-free survival; PK=pharmacokinetics; SEER=Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; TURBT=transurethral resection of bladder tumor.
Scroll down to learn more about Checkmate 274
CHECKMATE 274: FOR ADULT PATIENTS WITH UC AT HIGH RISK OF RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL RESECTION OF UC
First and only phase 3, placebo-controlled adjuvant trial in patients with UC2,3,9
Checkmate 274 includes data from an extended follow-up analysis at a minimum follow-up time of 31.6 months.10¶
- This trial excluded patients with any condition requiring systemic treatment with immunosuppressants (eg, glucocorticoids) within 2 weeks of treatment11
- DFS was defined as time to first recurrence (local urothelial tract, local non-urothelial tract, or distant metastasis), or death2
- Minimum follow-up time in all randomized patients was 5.9 months. Median follow-up time in all randomized patients was 20.9 months for OPDIVO® (nivolumab) and 19.5 months for placebo3
*Urothelial carcinoma originating in the bladder or upper urinary tract (renal pelvis or ureter).2
†AJCC tumor stage.12
‡Using the PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx assay.2
§Approved dosing for OPDIVO is 240 mg IV q2w or 480 mg IV q4w.2
||OS data are immature at the time of the planned interim analysis.2,3
¶Based on extended follow-up analysis in all randomized patients at a minimum follow-up time of 31.6 months and a median follow-up time of 37.4 months for OPDIVO and 33.9 months for placebo.12
ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; ICH=immunohistochemistry; IV=intravenous; OS=overall survival; q2w=every 2 weeks; q4w=every 4 weeks.
Select Important Safety Information
Serious Adverse Reactions
In Checkmate 274, serious adverse reactions occurred in 30% of patients receiving OPDIVO (n=351). The most frequent serious adverse reaction reported in ≥2% of patients receiving OPDIVO was urinary tract infection. Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 1% of patients; these included events of pneumonitis (0.6%).
Common Adverse Reactions
In Checkmate 274, the most common adverse reactions (≥20%) reported in patients receiving OPDIVO (n=351) were rash (36%), fatigue (36%), diarrhea (30%), pruritus (30%), musculoskeletal pain (28%), and urinary tract infection (22%).
Please see additional Important Safety Information below and U.S. Full Prescribing Information for OPDIVO.
Patient eligibility criteria
CHECKMATE 274 DEFINED PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK OF RECURRENCE
ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA2:
OPDIVO Qvantig and OPDIVO IV are the only FDA-approved adjuvant options for these patients, regardless of prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nodal involvement, or PD-L1 status1,2
*Cisplatin-based.2
†Are not eligible for or refused cisplatin-based chemotherapy.2
Checkmate 274 baseline characteristics9
In the OPDIVO IV arm:
- ~40% of patients expressed PD-L1 ≥1%9
- ~43% of patients received prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy9
- ~47% of patients had nodal involvement9
*Not reported for 1 patient in the placebo arm.9
†ECOG PS of 2 was permitted only for patients who did not receive cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were ineligible for adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy.8
‡The AJCC tumor staging included patients with N+, N0, or Nx.9,12
§Not reported for 1 patient in each arm.9
IVRS=Interactive Voice-Response System.
Continued disease-free survival with OPDIVO IV at 31.6-month minimum follow-up10*†
DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL IN ALL RANDOMIZED PATIENTS
(31.6-MONTH MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP)10
Limitation: Checkmate 274 was not powered to detect differences in the treatment effect at extended follow-up analysis; therefore, results from this exploratory analysis should be interpreted with caution.
Primary analysis:
mDFS in all randomized patients (minimum follow-up time of 5.9 months; median follow-up time of 20.9 months for OPDIVO IV and 19.5 months for placebo)2,3
- OPDIVO IV: 20.8 months (95% CI: 16.5–27.6)2,3
- Placebo: 10.8 months (95% CI: 8.3–13.9)2,3
- HR=0.70 (95% CI: 0.57–0.86); P=0.00082,3
mDFS in patients with PD-L1 ≥1% (minimum follow-up time of 6.3 months; median follow-up time of 22.1 months for OPDIVO IV and 18.7 months for placebo)2,12
- OPDIVO IV: NR (95% CI: 21.2–NE)2
- Placebo: 8.4 months (95% CI: 5.6–21.2)2
- HR=0.55 (95% CI: 0.39–0.77); P=0.00052
Extended follow-up analysis:
mDFS in patients with PD-L1 ≥1% (median follow-up time of 39.8 months for OPDIVO IV and 33.3 months for placebo)10
- OPDIVO IV: 52.6 months (95% CI: 25.8–NE)10
- Placebo: 8.4 months (95% CI: 5.6–17.9)10
- HR=0.52 (95% CI: 0.37–0.72)10
Primary analysis exploratory and secondary endpoint information
- In exploratory subgroup analyses in patients with upper tract UC (n=149), no improvement in DFS was observed in the nivolumab arm compared to the placebo arm. The unstratified DFS hazard ratio estimate was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.74–1.80)2
- In an exploratory subgroup analysis in patients with PD-L1 expression of <1% (n=414), the unstratified DFS hazard ratio estimate was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.64–1.08)2
- OS data are immature with 33% of deaths in the overall randomized population. In the UTUC subpopulation, 37 deaths occurred (20 in the nivolumab arm, 17 in the placebo arm)2
*Based on extended follow-up analysis in all randomized patients at a minimum follow-up time of 31.6 months and a median follow-up time of 37.4 months for OPDIVO and 33.9 months for placebo.10
†Vs placebo.10
HR=hazard ratio; NE=not estimable; NR=not reached; UTUC=upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Overall survival with OPDIVO IV14*
OVERALL SURVIVAL IN ALL RANDOMIZED PATIENTS
(INTERIM ANALYSIS AT 31.6-MONTH MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP; 36.1-MONTH MEDIAN FOLLOW-UP)14
Limitation: OS data are immature and follow-up is ongoing as the prespecified statistical boundary for significance was not met at the time of this analysis. Results are descriptive and should be interpreted with caution.
Primary analysis secondary endpoint information (minimum follow-up time of 5.9 months; median follow-up time of 20.9 months for OPDIVO IV and 19.5 months for placebo)3
- OS data are immature with 33% of deaths in overall randomized population. In the UTUC subpopulation, 37 deaths occurred (20 in the nivolumab arm, 17 in the placebo arm)2
Median OS in patients with PD-L1 ≥1% (interim analysis at minimum follow-up time of 11.4 months; median follow-up time of 23.4 months)14
- OPDIVO IV (n=140): NR (95% CI: NE)14
- Placebo (n=142): NR (95% CI: 29.0–NE)14
- HR=0.56 (95% CI: 0.36–0.86)14
*Based on pre-planned interim analysis in all randomized patients at a minimum follow-up time of 31.6 months and a median follow-up time of 36.1 months.14
Disease-free survival and interim OS data with OPDIVO IV15*†‡
Checkmate 274
Primary endpoint in all randomized patients
DFS at the 59.6-month minimum follow-up
26%
reduced risk of recurrence or death
HR=0.74 (95% CI: 0.61-0.90)
• mDFS: 21.9 months (95% Cl: 18.8-36.9) for OPDIVO IV and 11.0 months (95% CI: 8.3-16.6) for placebo
Secondary endpoint in all randomized patients
Interim OS data at the 59.6-month minimum follow-up
54.6%
of patients still alive at 5 years with OPDIVO IV vs 47.1% with placebo
• mOS: 75.0 months (95% CI: 56.7-NE) for OPDIVO IV and 50.1 months (95% CI: 38.0-72.1) for placebo; HR=0.83 (95% CI: 0.67-1.02)
Limitations: Analyses of the follow-up data were not prespecified within the study protocol and were not powered to detect differences between treatment arms; therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution. OS data are immature and follow-up is ongoing as the pre-specified statistical boundary for significance was not met at the time of this analysis. Results are descriptive and should be interpreted with caution.
- mDFS in patients with PD-L1 ≥1% (minimum follow-up time of 60.0 months): 55.5 months (95% CI: 25.8–66.5) for OPDIVO IV and 8.4 months (95% Cl: 5.6-20.0) for placebo; HR=0.58 (95% CI: 0.42–0.79)
- mDFS in all randomized patients (minimum follow-up time of 5.9 months; median follow-up time of 20.9 months for OPDIVO IV and 19.5 months for placebo): 20.8 months (95% CI: 16.5–27.6) for OPDIVO IV and 10.8 months (95% CI: 8.3–13.9) for placebo; HR=0.70 (95% CI: 0.57–0.86); P=0.00082,3,15
- mDFS in patients with PD-L1 ≥1% (minimum follow-up time of 6.3 months; median follow-up time of 22.1 months for OPDIVO IV and 18.7 months for placebo): NR (95% CI: 21.2–NE) for OPDIVO IV and 8.4 months (95% CI: 5.6–21.2) for placebo; HR=0.55 (95% CI: 0.39–0.77); P=0.00052,13,15
- In exploratory subgroup analyses in patients with upper tract UC (n=149), no improvement in DFS was observed in the OPDIVO IV arm compared with the placebo arm. The unstratified DFS hazard ratio estimate was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.74–1.80)1
- OS in all randomized patients (minimum follow-up time of 5.9 months; median follow-up time of 20.9 months for OPDIVO IV and 19.5 months for placebo): OS data were immature with 33% of deaths. In the UTUC subpopulation, 37 deaths occurred (20 in the nivolumab arm, 17 in the placebo arm)2,3
*vs placebo.15
†Based on extended follow-up analysis in all randomized patients who received OPDIVO IV or placebo at a minimum follow-up time of 59.6 months and a median follow-up time of 43.4 months.15
‡See study design for additional information on Checkmate 274.
§Based on extended follow-up analysis in patients with tumor expression PD-L1 expression ≥1% who received OPDIVO IV or placebo at a minimum follow-up of 60.0 months and a median follow-up of 52.9 months.2
Study design: Checkmate 67T was a phase 3, randomized (1:1), open-label, non-inferiority trial evaluating OPDIVO Qvantig (1,200 mg of nivolumab and 20,000 units of hyaluronidase) compared with OPDIVO IV, in adult patients with advanced or metastatic ccRCC who received prior systemic therapy. Patients were stratified by weight (<80 kg versus ≥80 kg) and IMDC risk score (favorable vs intermediate vs poor risk). A total of 495 patients were randomized to receive either OPDIVO Qvantig every 4 weeks subcutaneously (n=248) or OPDIVO 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously (n=247). The co-primary endpoints were time-averaged serum concentration over 28 days (Cavgd28) and minimum serum concentration at steady state (Cminss). The key powered secondary endpoint was ORR, as assessed by BICR. The minimum follow-up time was 8 months.1,6
Results: Co-primary PK endpoints: Cavgd28 GMR of 2.10 (90% CI: 2.00–2.20) and Cminss GMR of 1.77 (90% CI: 1.63–1.93). ORR was 24% (95% CI: 19–30) for OPDIVO Qvantig (n=248) and 28% (95% CI: 14–24) for OPDIVO IV (n=247) with a risk ratio of 1.33 (95% CI: 0.94–1.87). Both PK and ORR met the predefined acceptance margin for non-inferiority. The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) in patients treated with OPDIVO Qvantig were musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, pruritus, rash, hypothyroidism, diarrhea, cough, and abdominal pain. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 28% of patients who received OPDIVO Qvantig. Serious adverse reactions in >1% of patients included pleural effusion, pneumonitis, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hemorrhage, and diarrhea.1,6
OPDIVO Qvantig dosing options1
OPDIVO is still available as an IV infusion. View OPDIVO IV dosing schedule >
INDICATION OPDIVO Qvantig (nivolumab + hyaluronidase-nvhy), as monotherapy, is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) who are at high risk of recurrence after undergoing radical resection of UC.
- OPDIVO Qvantig is administered as a 3- to 5-minute subcutaneous injection1
- Review the Full US Prescribing Information for recommended dosage information for OPDIVO Qvantig
- No premedication required1
Safety Data
View a selected safety profile of adverse reactions seen in clinical trials.
Dosing Schedules
Find dosing information to get patients started on therapy.
More UC Indications
Learn about another urothelial carcinoma indication.
Learn more about how OPDIVO is approved for use in earlier stages of cancer
References:
- OPDIVO Qvantig® [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
- OPDIVO® (nivolumab) [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
- Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(22):2102-2114.
- Jodon G, Fischer SM, Kessler ER. Treatment of urothelial cancer in elderly patients: focus on immune checkpoint inhibitors. Drugs Aging. 2018;35(5):409-421.
- Duplisea JJ, Dinney CPN. Should chemotherapy still be used to treat all muscle invasive bladder cancer in the "era of immunotherapy"? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2019;19(7):543-545.
- Albiges L, Bourlon MT, Chacón M, et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2025;36(1):99-107.
- Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(22):2102-2114.
- Drakaki A, Pantuck A, Mhatre SK, et al. "Real-world" outcomes and prognostic indicators among patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2021;39(1):76.e15-76.e22.
- Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. First results from the phase 3 CheckMate 274 trial of adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in patients who underwent radical surgery for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Oral presentation at ASCO GU 2021. Abstract 391.
- Galsky MD, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. Extended follow-up results from the CheckMate 274 trial. Oral presentation at ASCO GU 2021. Abstract LBA443.
- Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(22):2102-2114. [supplementary appendix]
- Bladder cancer early detection, diagnosis, and staging. American Cancer Society. Accessed March 15, 2026. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/CRC/PDF/Public/8559.00.pdf
- Data on file. NIVO 639. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
- Galsky MD, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, et al. Extended follow-up from CheckMate 274 including the first report of overall survival outcomes. Oral presentation at EAU 2024.
- Galsky MD, Gschwend JE, Milowsky MI, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab vs placebo for high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: 5-year efficacy and ctDNA results from CheckMate 274. Oral presentation at ESMO 2025. Presentation 30680.